Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Char
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Deepak Char (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- This article have content i think this article should kept or might considered as stub article, look at the sources.[[1]] [[2]] Travis Headache (talk) 14:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Revirvlkodlaku (talk · contribs) hi, you didn't responded. Travis Headache (talk) 15:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Travis Headache, this is a deletion discussion, where the pros and cons of a page are debated. You didn't address me in any manner, so there was nothing for me to respond to. I don't feel like the topic of the article is notable, that's why I nominated it for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Revirvlkodlaku (talk · contribs) hi, you didn't responded. Travis Headache (talk) 15:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Shellwood (talk) 14:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment, Management, and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Another one of those pages used for promotion and reads clearly like a resume. The sources are poor, primary (written by subject himself), unreliable and with passing mention. The subject's achievements are not substantial and noteworthy to warrant a page on wikipedia. Fails WP:GNG. RangersRus (talk) 17:09, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as it fails WP:GNG. This absolutely reads like self promotion and there aren't satisfactory independent sources covering Char. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:24, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.