Talk:Tupolev Tu-116
Latest comment: 2 months ago by 1234qwer1234qwer4 in topic "Tu-166" listed at Redirects for discussion
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Tupolev-116 was copied or moved into Tupolev Tu-116 with [616211879 this edit]. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
There is no need for a separate article on the Tu-116. It is entirely appropriate that it be covered by the variant section of the Tu-95. I propose transfer of any relevant info and deletion.Petebutt (talk) 06:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Petebutt (talk · contribs) on 2 January 2010 with the comment: Superfluous, better covered in Tu-95 article. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
.png)
- Bit of confusion it has been marked as an article for deletion on the page and the label above mentions a proposed deletion which is not the same thing. Dont have a problem with your idea but I think a merge proposal is all that is needed. Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 12:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Merger
editMerger carried out with Tu-95 article.Petebutt (talk) 08:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
"Tu-166" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Tu-166 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 27 § Tu-166 until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC)